XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[JJSeabrook]

Realizer, it would basically result in waiving their right to respond. No, I don't think the Court would hold them in contempt at all, but his ruling could be quite contemptous in that he'd certainly be inclined to roll right along with VRNG's request for 7% of 20.9%, if not more.

GOOG wouldn't be delaying anything by not responding. In fact, they would be hurrying up a ruling by HJJ as he would just have to rule upon a motion that had no opposition. There would also be no reply due from VRNG, of course, if there was no response. The Court would just rule upon the unopposed motion. IF GOOG's counsel missed the deadline tonight, they better be calling their malpractice carrier. Again, they're simply not going to miss it.

JJ



Realizer Member Profile Realizer

Monday, May 13, 2013 8:14:33 PM
Re: JJSeabrook post# 34029
Post # of 34031
Thank you JJ,

So it is frowned upon by the courts then but not necessarily a mandated response?

Or Would they be looking at contempt or ?

Like I said they will most likely do so. The only reason not to would be in fear of pissing the judge off and looking as though they where desperate and becoming justice delayers.