Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[Flatcat]

Your "FACTS" are deniable because they are not facts and not true including your "FACT" about BAM shareholders. They still have their shares, some are now unrestricted and deposited and some are still restricted certificates.

This company has proven patents, proven products, and yes there are very good legal reasons why some sales are prohibited, by law, from being reported.

When all "toxic issues" are resolved there is absolutely no reason why BI cannot obtain funding for growing the company.

The company is currently going through several years of history and mistakes by former management, identifying each, developing a corrective action plan, and will then execute the plan. The current management is doing things right. Not to the schedule of what some outsiders think should happen, but to a realistic management plan.

BIW is handling the sales end. BI has available production facilities other than at the home office as has been previously reported.

Where on earth did you obtain the alleged fact that if production was done on a royalty basis that BI would only get 1%? Do you have a copy of a royalty agreement BI has made that indicates a 1% return? Management of BI would never be that stupid.

No rebuttal is NOT "a clear announcement by all here" that what you say is valid. In fact, no rebuttal more likely means that there was nothing worth replying to.

Please do not include the phrase "No replies . . . for a rebuttal is a clear announcement by all here" because that is blatantly false! You certainly do not speak for me.