Logic…Reality
Something new occurred to me here…
HTF – what is it?
Liquid Hydrocarbons (oil)
When plastic is melted and turns to liquid then it is cracked… it turns into liquid hydrocarbons (oil).
Interesting point in the patent application states that some of the heavier liquid output (oil) is redirected back into the input to be recracked (into shorter, lighter fuel).
Logic-
Just some basic logic here-
If they are currently redirecting liquid output (oil) through the system already, what is the need to add more?
The output is already hot so it would be better at doing the job of ‘heat transfer’ since it is reusing heat already in the system anyway and there would be no need to have to heat fresh HTF (oil) that is introduced at room temperature.
What is the reason for HTF again? Oh, yeah, to fill in the spaces between the plastic with a liquid that can transfer the heat more efficiently… (really??? Logically I have to say it again… really?)
Conclusion-
I have to revert back to my past conclusion here since logic does not seem to apply in any way that would or could justify a delay or redesign or addition of or change to permits, equipment, tanks, piping or anything that could slow down/change/delay production, and that is again a very simple and logical explanation-
HTF was the perfect way to increase output volume numbers, …period.
It serves no purpose that is not already addressed with the hot HTF that the unit is already producing and being run through the system. It is already designed, permitted and plumbed in the system based on the patent application so why cause any delay… unless of course a more logical answer is that they need delays for more obvious and logical reasons.
Reality-
If you apply basic logic and the bs test (bs test = statement + time) to this company and its timeline you can make some very solid conclusions.
All of the initial hype was bs as proven by time
All of the initial numbers were bs as proven by time
All of the technology (being any diff than paralysis) is bs as proven by time
All of the promises of CFP were bs as proven by time
All of the stock chatter/hype/spam/bragging was bs as proven by time
All of the third party valuations were bs as proven by time
All of the current state of functionality ‘but this is a work in progress, and it can’t be perfect right out of the gate’ (yet the statements of functionality at that time were not true and are still not even close) is bs as proven by time
It all goes back to the single question- If it worked why hasn’t there been a single machine running 24/7 for the last 4 years producing? There have been plenty of statements of $10mill/year and references to third party validation that claims that the machines as tested (no new design, updates, revisions, htf or super #3 but the old processor as tested that have been completed and functional for years) were proven to function and produce $10mill/yr of fuel… Obviously bs as proven by time. (who sits on a machine or 2 that were proven by a third party to produce $10mill… Seriously, is this a complete lack of proper management (glorious management also proven to be bs by time) or is this proof that the glorious third party validation is bs as proven by time?
Any way you look at it it is logically a very clear reality… time has made the bs clear.
There is no need for HTF except to boost volume numbers and act as a convenient excuse for more delay.
more bs to be proven by time
Disclaimer;
I am in no way compensated for my opinion or my posts on this site. I have no ‘secret agenda’ or personal gain that can be materialized from the act and method of my postings. I am simply a concerned, ‘outside’ interest with valid knowledge and information that I feel may be helpful. I chose to provide this information and related opinions at my own will and from the direction of no person, company or entity. My motive is to help those that may not have the background, knowledge, means or access to this information and my personal desire to gain additional knowledge and understanding of the topics discussed. I am compelled to educate. No ill will, malice, defamation, or slander is intended in any way. All literary creativity utilized in my posts are intended as a vehicle to express my opinions. I am always open to mature discussions of substance and encourage rebuttal and enlightenment. My sincere apologies go out to anyone that is disturbed by the revelations of fact that I have conveyed in the past or may provide in the future.
