Bebida Beverage Company (BBDA)

[kidnova]

I don't need an answer from him to comment on his actions. If I were running a public company and my actions had resulted in my investors losing thousands, or perhaps even millions, of dollars then I would find it to be my own responsibility to give an explanation. Otherwise I would expect to be brought to task for it and/or removed from my position. Seeing as how the CEO has ensured that investors in this company have no voting rights or any other method by which to hold him accountable for his actions that isn't really an option.

One accusation that he is most definitely aware of is the one dealing with dilution. That's very easy for him to answer by simply ungagging the TA. Why won't he do that?