InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252343
Next 10
Followers 73
Posts 3426
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/28/2004

Re: jq1234 post# 160838

Tuesday, 05/07/2013 5:39:15 PM

Tuesday, May 07, 2013 5:39:15 PM

Post# of 252343
ARRY:

I honestly don't understand its decision process. As if it doesn't have enough on its plate already with 520 and 614 which are supposed to be in pivotal trials soon, it has to run a ph3 trial based on data not from MEK162, rather from Selumetinib, without selection of RAS/RAF marker.



I guess this is, in part, what I was getting at. If this indication is worth investing in, then why wouldn't NVS take the lead as they've done for melanoma?

Or do NVS / ARRY have internal data that show the LGSOC indication to be low hanging fruit, and NVS is letting ARRY lead the charge so that they gain some development expertise?

I do think too many programs is a red flag for early stage biotechs, so I wonder what is really motivating ARRY here.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.