Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[CoalTrain]

"What idiots make a military plan based largely on the assumption that the opposing army will give up??"

-WHO made a plan based largely on the assumption that the opposing army will give up???? Can you prove it? I think you're spending too much time reading pundits and commentators and believing in their guesses.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
From todays news, Rumsfeld still hoping the Iraqi's defeat themselves while we wait outside Baghdad. ROTFLMAO!!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030328/ap_on_re_mi_ea/war_us_military&ci...

I know, Rumsfeld is an unreliable news source. A Commentator with an anti-American opinion. A Pundit. Associated Press is an unreliable anti-American news source, nothing but commentators. LMAO!

Our administration went to Iraq in without a viable plan. If the public would not be so dumb and blind and if it would ask more critical questions of the administration we might have a plan and not be losing as many of our troops as we are.

Being stupid is un-patriotic. Democracy does not work when the public is stupid or hysterical for long periods of time.
Wake up and smell the coffe.

CT

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld suggested on Thursday that U.S. forces bearing down on Baghdad might lay siege to the capital and hope anti-Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) citizens rise up against the government before American troops have to invade the city of 5 million.