InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1365
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2006

Re: parentsgratae post# 7412

Friday, 05/03/2013 2:52:00 PM

Friday, May 03, 2013 2:52:00 PM

Post# of 16772
One more point; yes a fiduciary duty may be applicable because your links assume the company paid for the expenses related to the patent; in this case, this does not apply and, therefore, the CEO is the sole owner of the patent. What all of the links do not consider is WHO PAID FOR THE PATENT COSTS; the links are assuming the company funded and therefore owns the patent by the officer.
Parents