The writings on the wall…
It seems that my presence is not necessary at this point although I figured I’d pop in to clear the air of rumors that I was forcefully suppressed... if you know what I mean.
My main contributions were from a technical standpoint, but it seems the problems have diverted to a deeper, more critical issue, the company/management/direction... which seem to be a much bigger issue than the obvious facts regarding the failing technological endeavor. This is of course looking at it as an actual company interested in carrying out a business plan based on a realistic set of goals. However, once you observe the big picture and look at the evidence, it is more plausible to conclude ulterior motives. I would say that the term 'scam' comes to mind... however, the fact is that in the eyes of the SEC... this is not a scam. The reason is simple- The company has stated in black and white that many detailed points can cause it to fail. Add a bit of manufactured honest enthusiasm along with some expensive props and you have a perfectly legal venture that is free to play out and willfully separate money from those that chose to offer it and those that divert it to people directing the show. (fraud is illegal, scams are possible, when you go to the movies are you scammed into 'believing'? but yet you willfully trade money for the 'belief'... well with this venture you certainly have a lot of entertainment value here) Success or failure is of no consequence to those that are gaining from the venture... they are reaping daily rewards and have no financial ill effects when it all comes to an end.... in fact they walk away to retire well.
I would like to think that I had a positive influence on those choosing to have an open mind to consider facts vs. ‘feelings’... after explaining the absurdity of the Crayola situation... it is difficult to imagine anyone reading my posts regarding the math and the waste in shipping cost and fuel consumption to be able to logically justify any positive conclusion for this company or p2o technology. The mental image of burning more fuel than can be made and paying $20 in shipping to make $5 in fuel is enough to make it clear to even the most nontechnical individual.
The fundamental problem remains- it cost more for plastic/shipping/processing than the value of the output.
That is not counting all of the millions spent on the equipment and infrastructure.
No matter what kind of catalyst is used, unless there is a way to make 5-10x more value from the output... it's a diminishing return.
In the .40s now means, with a lot of potential sell weight behind it, next week is going to be very interesting once the poor Q#s come out... and based on the volume here it seems that there is more than just bad #s news... there must be some added bad news pending.
Add in the major distraction of litigation… anyone that has had the pleasure of giving a deposition would know what a mental distraction this can be, especially if it is personal… and the state of company progress is surely disrupted and fragmented.
All of the unrest for the current management adds to the tension and distraction.
Throw in some questions as to intent of the alleged sale of stock by jb and the mass of negativity culminates in quite a bad taste in the mouth of anyone observing this mess. Just consider the compensation that jb is receiving… is it really conceivable that someone that is indemnified by the corporation for legal expenses and has what appears to be a significant accumulation of finances from his position(s) with these ventures and it begs the question as to what motive would someone in his position have to sell shares of stock. If the guy running the show is not long then what is that to say of those that are? Those not as close to the situation… not as privy to the knowledge of the future and direction? Let’s face it… if jb believes that the company/technology will succeed, would it not be his belief that the share price will increase by many multiples of its current value? Why would anyone with that knowledge and belief sell short.. for a fraction of the potential value??? This action alone speaks volumes in so many ways about the future of jbi… without uttering a word….
Disclaimer;
I am in no way compensated for my opinion or my posts on this site. I have no ‘secret agenda’ or personal gain that can be materialized from the act and method of my postings. I am simply a concerned, ‘outside’ interest with valid knowledge and information that I feel may be helpful. I chose to provide this information and related opinions at my own will and from the direction of no person, company or entity. My motive is to help those that may not have the background, knowledge, means or access to this information and my personal desire to gain additional knowledge and understanding of the topics discussed. I am compelled to educate. No ill will, malice, defamation, or slander is intended in any way. All literary creativity utilized in my posts are intended as a vehicle to express my opinions. I am always open to mature discussions of substance and encourage rebuttal and enlightenment. My sincere apologies go out to anyone that is disturbed by the revelations of fact that I have conveyed in the past or may provide in the future.
