InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2006

Re: finbar99 post# 6147

Thursday, 05/02/2013 10:17:28 AM

Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:17:28 AM

Post# of 14330
Looking through the supplemental declaration in support of the sale, I'm thinking we are probably going to see a similar arrangement on Burnstone. Nobody is going to want to pay 300 or 400 mm for a property that needs another 100 mm of capex in this environment. Based on what transpired with the bids on Hollister, I think the creditors see the only way to potentially salvage value is via the NPI agreements. I bet we wind up seeing 100 mm cash plus a NPI capped at say 300-400 million - which would have a present value of 50 mm - right at my 150 mm guess. If I was a creditor, I'd be pushing for this type of arrangement as it at least preserves some chance of future recovery.....but equity is toast with this route.


http://www.gcginc.com/cases/rodeocreekgold/pdflib/448_50301.pdf
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.