NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[JG36]

Puffer, you seem to misunderstand why publishing peer reviewed results is necessary. It's not solely to increase the credibility of NNVC to outside investors (although that's certainly a very good reason in itself). Humans have an enormous capacity not only to fool each other but more importantly themselves. If you have a strong reason to want to believe something is true you focus upon the evidence that supports it and ignore the evidence that contradicts it. The scientific method is largely about how not to fool yourself and others. Under peer review people who don't have a vested interest in seeing NNVC succeed will be looking for flaws in the experiments or the analysis. If they don't find them, that's great. If they do, maybe the experiments can be done better. Or maybe Flucide isn't as effective as hoped. In any case, we're more likely to get at the truth, whatever it is, if peer review is used.