InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2006

Re: trandernine post# 6039

Tuesday, 04/30/2013 1:24:36 PM

Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:24:36 PM

Post# of 14330
>>Even looking at hollister (if true that CS got a shaft by making it accept royalties to get its debt paid back) it is sold for 110M.

What part of 90 mm being an absolute cap, a ceiling, do you not understand? It's not 90 mm of value - it's a contingent value right that is worth between zero, and at absolute best, the present value of 90 million over 9 years. But with Hollister currently losing money on production, the current value is closer to the zero side. Detach from your emotions for a second and think about the fact that Waterton won with 15 mm dollars cash and 15% of any future net profits on the asset they only put 15 mm of cash down on. Look at it the other way - to get the full 90 mm, Waterton will have to make $600,000,000 of NET PROFIT on the operation they paid $15,000,000 cash for....in 9 years or less. Good luck with that.

And the last monitor report stated definitely that 3 bids were received on Burnstone by the bid deadline - you should follow details like this more closely if you have money on the table.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.