Didn't your argument to Silicon Investor include the fact that things that were said weren't true. Why didn't you just let "the judge prove the truth"?
>>As I recall, the only thing that got deleted on his thread was the posting of a confidential document with a bunch of names, addresses, and a clear disclosure on the front that it was copyrighted, confidential and not intended for him. That breaks a whole bunch of SI's rules without even going into what the content of the actual document was. The other stuff he said about me, big deal, I just refute it.
MB