InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2006

Re: uredaddybewho post# 734

Sunday, 04/28/2013 11:37:04 AM

Sunday, April 28, 2013 11:37:04 AM

Post# of 893
I wasn't aware Baker McKenzie was already on the case - yes it would be a conflict for anyone at the firm to represent common. Not surprised I guess that the convertible noteholders used her as she is very good. Proskaeur will normally do this sort of thing too, but I believe at some point I saw they were involved at some level as well.

My interest is in seeing the equity not get screwed, even though I don't have shares at this point. I've traded bk stocks for 10 years - I like to see equity get their due when it's fair whether I hold or not. I think equity deserves to be included in the plan here - I don't hold shares because I don't think that will happen - if I did have shares, I'd be making phone calls and emails to attorneys trying to convince them they have a good shot at being appointed as EC counsel in this case. My point remains - you need to find counsel (who isn't conflicted) that does EC work on a regular basis because time is of the essence - if you don't believe me, just keep writing shareholder letters to the court and see where that gets you.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.