InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 324
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/05/2013

Re: Chag post# 42316

Saturday, 04/27/2013 9:10:43 PM

Saturday, April 27, 2013 9:10:43 PM

Post# of 92241
What is that saying? Doesn't even mention FUSE. Just says that Tiger had to take a cheaper endorsement. Even though they don't pay nearly as much as Nike did off the bat, Tiger still has a choice of who to take as an endorsement. He would not have just chosen anything to endorse. Not sure if you are for or against the article in being good for Fuse, but I think it is good PR for us longs.