Saturday, April 27, 2013 2:51:47 PM
So, after all, ING was violating the rules and not conducting its business properly. That explains why it tried to jump ship on PNFO’s bond and NOW DOES give evidence that those bonds are probably real.
I don’t know if this will have any direct impact with PFNO and if any of those millions are coming our way. If not, one thing is for sure: PFNO and RDG lawyers sure do have extra leverage in legally pursuing its bonds.
ING does not look good right now. Supporting the enemy? Sid is a whole helluva lot better than that.
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM