InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: arper post# 32690

Wednesday, 04/24/2013 3:00:38 PM

Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:00:38 PM

Post# of 68424
What I meant to say was a change in tactic. If they truly had a work around that was viable and they were willing to actually implement in their live search why the delays? What I mean is this. They said Vringo can't see the code til May 18. Second their point man is not available for all of May and the first week of June. A company this size has only on person that can speak to this code and he is conveniently delayed a month and a half. You don't see this as somewhat odd?

Then they go on to say that They would like to depose Dr. Becker in July. This is 3 months. How much time does it take to analyze the code and agree/disagree whether it infringes or not? Also if it does not then how much time does Google have to actually implement it. I see this whole situation as a stall/delay strategy for the purpose of extracting a better deal from Vringo/Microsoft. Originally we heard nothing from Google except that they would appeal everything now they have this magic bullet that they know will take months to work through. I don't see it as credible. It also does not change HJJ criteria for ruling. His ruling will still be based on the trial and the post-trial motions.