InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 6407
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2011

Re: Slashnuts post# 34341

Tuesday, 04/23/2013 6:24:01 PM

Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:24:01 PM

Post# of 52852
If/when the courts (note the plural, because we are ultimately headed to the IP Court of appeals in DC) agrees that the IP of GERS is theirs and theirs alone, wouldn't it be a better strategy to engage all the other alleged "infingers" in dialogue and diplomacy hoping to avoid further ligation? With the "handwriting on the wall" I suspect that these other companies would be much more amenable to signing licenses. In fact, If GERS management strikes directly in court without this diplomatic phase, I would consider them to have violated their fiduciary responsibility to common shareholders, since as we all know we will be the ones paying for the next round as well.

So you can beat your chest, and the tom-toms, and you can shout your war hoop; I for one hope that they are not listening to your bellicose threats and see them as only a last resort post this round of litigation.