InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 2646
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2010

Re: radcardnel post# 34335

Tuesday, 04/23/2013 5:03:44 PM

Tuesday, April 23, 2013 5:03:44 PM

Post# of 52845
Nobody is debating the effects patent infringement had on this company. Dilution, R/S, loss of revenue, etc. It's a track record, but not in the aspect you insinuate. It's proof to the court's of the damages done by patent infringing companies like ICM and PEIX. It's a track record that makes the case for an injunction as a just resolution this year.

You have no issues with GERS' technology because there are no issues with GERS' technology. The patents are solid, backed by the USPTO, reviewed again by the USPTO, and reconfirmed even after considering all the arguements by the infringers. The "prior art" has been reviewed and denied by the judge. The patents claims have been interpreted in GERS' favor by the judge. ICM has done everything under the sun to stop GERS and failed. Including filing a so-called lawsuit against GERS' that's now been dismissed.

It's too bad ICM drug PEIX into this. I was actually considering investing in them when I discovered they were infringing. Since my discovery, their stock has gone from $.72 to $.27.

GERS is a victim of a patent infringement crime. Past damages owed are several hundred million dollars. I continue to purchase shares in GERS and GPRE. I believe GERS will have another 900% gain in one day like they've had before. This stock is a court ruling away from astronomical gains that'll make your head spin.

Let the truth be told about the publicly infringing companies like PEIX, REX, and VLO. It does wonders for their stock price and draws attention from those companies to this one, with you as my example.

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$