I haven't ignored anything. and a preliminary technical report that was using the NI 43-101 as a guideline is good, not bad. But you are basing your comments on the entire report as an NI 43-101 would be done. This is not an NI 43-101!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!It's a preliminary technical report. I have read it and the SEC would be all over them if they misstated any valuation of assets. The SEC 2 years ago started going after miners for doing just that. If colorado goldfields is stupid enough to do that, then they would be in huge trouble. I was in a mining stock over a year ago that did that and they got into huge trouble. And it happened almost immediately, with-in days after the PR. That's clearly not the case here. The PR came out in February! That was over 2 MONTHS AGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
567
GL
You need to follow the SEC actions as they pertain to what you are trying to say. They are all over miners who misstate assets in reports. The SEC is watching out for investors in the mining sector and would be on that sort of thing ASAP if it were done..................
If I got it right; "That's my one for the year!" If this had been an actual trading emergency you would have been instructed "TO NOT LISTEN TO ME!" There is no substitute for your own DD!!!
