InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: Newcombe post# 6405

Thursday, 12/01/2005 6:52:33 PM

Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:52:33 PM

Post# of 17023
Hope this helps:

DDR was not highlighted there in BW as an infringing design, but it should have been.

Only IFX gets DDR without royalty; they pay on the terms of the 3/05 settlement.

Sammy/Rambus license agreement is now in litigation (though this is no longer a separate case as appears in the complaint - it is consolidated.

http://investor.rambus.com/downloads/RambusvsSamsungComplaint.pdf
===========================
My question is, has the claim for DDR royalty now been dropped by Rambus in some kind of deal, or if not, is this just not relevant in the context of showing that the MMs conspired against RDRAM? (Or, though I am happy for favorable media coverage -- is it just that this would have unnecessarily complicated the "analysis"??
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News