Matt:
Some how i just rub that board the wrong way.
If u will check my posts and the responses, you will come to the conclusion that I don't instigate "Personal Attacks" unless it start to become a bashfest.
YOu may also find that i had handeld these attacks with some forbearance and humor.
I apperciated the cut and paste news nature of that board. I've often commented that they have some smart people there.
I was hoping, with my posts, to engage that board toward more investment/shareholder talk, beyond the Rah Rah.
After all the site is called 'Investorshub'.. not 'Truebelivershub' or 'Likemindedhub'.
It seems that, for some reason,there are a great deal of 'true believers' on that thread. Maybe they are working for QCOM, or just maybe they are holding original shares and are sitting pretty.
I notice there are only a handful of regular poster there and they all say mostly the same thing.
If I 'Agitate' a little to get the "regulars" or other investors to think and post a bit beyond the "News" as to whether QCOM is an investment stock, or a daytrade, it helps me, and maybe others to make investment decisions.
That board by and large is looking at any dissention at QCOM as an attack on a sacrad cow.
If I have misunderstood the nature of this website, then I have underestimated its importance to the investing public.
Lastly, if those on that thread are not interested in my opinions, they can ignore the post.
It's not like some on that thread are not interested in my observations.
I do also post News fetures.
I was hoping for a little more than the "good'ol boys' network, however I suppose a little bit of membership cash goes a long way to get rid of subversive QCOM nay-sayers as undesirables.
AI
