InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: arper post# 32095

Thursday, 04/18/2013 8:26:08 AM

Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:26:08 AM

Post# of 68424
The "new damages figure" seems to be a figment of Google's imagination. Dr. Becker testified at trial that 3-5% was appropriate, post trial he said 5% is a minimum. How can Google make the case that these statements constitute a new argument?

They want access to Dr. Becker so that they can try and get him to agree that a lower rate is also possible.