InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 172
Posts 4214
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2006

Re: keda post# 31922

Monday, 04/15/2013 4:04:56 PM

Monday, April 15, 2013 4:04:56 PM

Post# of 41960
keda,

"but jrf's calculations were based on the assumption that all the LP's were sold. "

No it's not. Never said that was based on all being sold. Someone else said I was saying that, and I refuted it then too. the return percentage to LPs is the same regardless of whether 1 was sold, 7 were sold or 100 were sold. I'm quoting what is going back to them at this time. But the number sold? Never talked about that. Partly because the number mentioned has changed a few times. Partly because I am misquoted when i say it.

But there is no assumption that all the LPs were sold on my part. Never had that thought, never said it, and it doesn't impact the amount of artifacts coming to the shareholders at this current time. Please realize that your statment about me is wrong. No biggie, but I wanted you to at least know that the statement is true regardelss of how many were sold and that I never said or though thtat all were sold. thanks. smile