The whole tenor of the articles and commentary are towards the idea that there is systemic fraud rampant in all of science, and I don't buy it.
Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that the 50% value is fraud. I'm speaking only of reproducibility; that can be due to fraud, ignorance, or the fuzziness that clark refers to.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.