![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, April 14, 2013 11:30:22 PM
In one case the district court held that the payment of sunset damages could not be stayed by posting a supersedeus bond under Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(d). 81
The footnote comes from this case:
Quote:
81
Active Video Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Comm., 10-cv-248 (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2011), rev’d,
No. 2011-1538, 2012 U.S.App.LEXIS 6764 (Fed.Cir. April 2, 2012)
Fotnote 81 :
This just happens to be Judge Jackson's case FYI.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Innovative Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Texas, USA • Jul 29, 2024 9:07 AM
INDEXR AI Merges With Moon Equity Holdings Corp. (MONI), Creating a Leading-edge Technology Company • MONI • Jul 29, 2024 9:59 AM
BNCM AND DELEX UNVEIL POST-MERGER MANAGEMENT PLANS • BNCM • Jul 29, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM