Sunday, April 14, 2013 2:56:06 PM
The question was what state law allows a 40 acre facility?
Not only would the feds have to reverse course, the state would have to better define "collective", wouldn't they? The fact that collectives must be "non-profit" makes Medical Greens just an "added" cost for the state-of-the-art facility, doesn't it?
The DEA has been cracking down on medical marijuana, though Obama said he wouldn't. It has supporters baffled. Maybe Holder will reverse course, but the next administration could pick right back up unless the federal laws are changed.
Looks like Dreaming Team lives on Fantasy Island. This won't be settle for at least a couple of years......MINIMUM.
Oh yeah, mark this post. Settled means new federal laws and clearer state laws. Right now CA law is as clear as mud and federal law prohibits what Medical Greens is proposing.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM