InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 475
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2013

Re: Steady_T post# 222111

Friday, 04/12/2013 4:22:17 PM

Friday, April 12, 2013 4:22:17 PM

Post# of 312016
In 2012... for the entire 12 months... there is only 2 weeks worth of output!

Facts are facts... 4 years and $55mill+ and not a single unit doing what it is claimed to do.

Processor 1, 1.5, 2 or 3 really do not matter at this point.

Label them any way you wish... they could not get any single unit or combination of such units to perform as indicated, validated or otherwise wished for.

Why would a company continue to build yet another unit when they can not get a single one to work anywhere close to expectation or justifiable validity?

When the entire basis of progress is focused on proof of concept and proof of commercial viability why on earth would the focus be on anything other than demonstrating that one machine can prove it?

Why spend time and money that is running out building processor 2, 3, 4, 5... or anything past 1 that works?

Why not spend every amount of energy time and money making the single processor fully functional at maximum output in order to justify the need for any more???

Wouldn't 1 unit running 24/7 with positive output make this golden? Wouldn't that be step 1 to moving forward with 2, 3, 4, 5... or a secondary deal or even a higher stock price, basis for positive funding... positive pr... world recognition???

How can anyone, rocktenn included, want to move forward with a complete mismanagement?

Any intelligent person or president, ceo, coo, of cot worth a fecal matter would pursue the simplest and most obvious goal.

That is unless they know that doing so would disprove the goal.



sorry if i can not respond further today but i believe i may be out of posts


G





Disclaimer;

I am in no way compensated for my opinion or my posts on this site. I have no ‘secret agenda’ or personal gain that can be materialized from the act and method of my postings. I am simply a concerned, ‘outside’ interest with valid knowledge and information that I feel may be helpful. I chose to provide this information and related opinions at my own will and from the direction of no person, company or entity. My motive is to help those that may not have the background, knowledge, means or access to this information and my personal desire to gain additional knowledge and understanding of the topics discussed. I am compelled to educate and help offset the continued barrage of misleading and obscured information that I have identified here. No ill will, malice, defamation, or slander is intended in any way. All literary creativity utilized in my posts are intended as a vehicle to express my opinions. I am always open to mature discussions of substance and encourage rebuttal and enlightenment. My sincere apologies go out to anyone that is disturbed by the revelations of fact that I have conveyed in the past or may provide in the future.