InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 475
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2013

Re: Steady_T post# 222101

Friday, 04/12/2013 3:14:25 PM

Friday, April 12, 2013 3:14:25 PM

Post# of 312016

3 days run time with one day cleanout is an up time of 75%. About what SAIC expected.



Where are the repair costs?

Where is the downtime for repairs counted?

75% is just for best case operation.

The SAIC test was run on processor #2 which is not an obsolete R&D processor. You seem to have got #2 confused with #1 which is a processor that is used for both production and R&D.



nope, processor #1 is in the jbi junk yard out back

#2 is the R&D unit that was the second used up ready for the junk yard unit

The "cost" of plastic at an RKT facility would still seem to be free.



How about the processing cost? Any thoughts on how much it will ACTUALLY cost to ACTUALLY run this and not just a perfect choice sample for testing?

According to RKT as posted on this board long ago only about 20% of the total plastic waste in in the form of raggertail.



Any documented facts on what jbi will get? The wording I have read seems to indicate that jbi will get what they give them and they must run it or pay to do something with it. The wording is not very conclusive either way but it certainly has the feeling of 'less describable' material written all over it. Thats from a company that is a recycling pro... think they are going to give or throw away good plastic?

JBI changed its business model long ago and decided not to use franchises and switched to company owned processors.




based on the fact that 4 years and $55mill+ later they still don't have anything that they can run reliably... any thoughts on why the change from mad riches in franchise fees to selling discounted shares to stay alive?



G





Disclaimer;

I am in no way compensated for my opinion or my posts on this site. I have no ‘secret agenda’ or personal gain that can be materialized from the act and method of my postings. I am simply a concerned, ‘outside’ interest with valid knowledge and information that I feel may be helpful. I chose to provide this information and related opinions at my own will and from the direction of no person, company or entity. My motive is to help those that may not have the background, knowledge, means or access to this information and my personal desire to gain additional knowledge and understanding of the topics discussed. I am compelled to educate and help offset the continued barrage of misleading and obscured information that I have identified here. No ill will, malice, defamation, or slander is intended in any way. All literary creativity utilized in my posts are intended as a vehicle to express my opinions. I am always open to mature discussions of substance and encourage rebuttal and enlightenment. My sincere apologies go out to anyone that is disturbed by the revelations of fact that I have conveyed in the past or may provide in the future.