InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 475
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2013

Re: snow post# 221983

Thursday, 04/11/2013 12:17:53 PM

Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:17:53 PM

Post# of 312016
This sounds like a common faulty theme-

More throughput but more downtime = REDUCED NET OUTPUT

Loss on one processor but run three processors = 3x NEGATIVE LOSS

Process limitations but add more processes = MORE LIMITATIONS

Processor don't work but build another processor = MORE SCRAP PROCESSORS (4 an 5 are going to replace 1 and 2)

Stock price at lowest level but offer more shares = LOWER LOWS

HTF > fuel value but run HTF = NEGATIVE PROFIT FUEL SALES
(as noted in the 10K they paid a high price for HTF)

Plastic more than fuel but make more fuel = NEGATIVE PROFIT FUEL SALES


A > B but run A anyway = B STILL LESS THAN A

(plastic value > fuel value but run plastic anyway = NEGATIVE PROFIT FUEL SALES)


At what point does it become obvious that this was all based on faulty math? Poor planning? Hype? Over promised Fantasy?


NO FREE plastic
NO $10brl
NO $10mill/yr processor
NO 70% uptime
NO SAIC validation based on FREE plastic
NO good naphtha
NO Madison County
NO CFP
NO PROFIT
NO COMMERCIAL VIABILITY






Disclaimer;

I am in no way compensated for my opinion or my posts on this site. I have no ‘secret agenda’ or personal gain that can be materialized from the act and method of my postings. I am simply a concerned, ‘outside’ interest with valid knowledge and information that I feel may be helpful. I chose to provide this information and related opinions at my own will and from the direction of no person, company or entity. My motive is to help those that may not have the background, knowledge, means or access to this information and my personal desire to reveal the fraud that this company is perpetrating. I am compelled to educate and help offset the continued barrage of misleading and obscured information that I have identified here and expose the perpetrators of this misguidance. No ill will, malice, defamation, or slander is intended in any way. All literary creativity utilized in my posts are intended as a vehicle to express my opinions. I am always open to mature discussions of substance and encourage rebuttal and enlightenment. My sincere apologies go out to anyone that is disturbed by the revelations of fact that I have conveyed in the past or may provide in the future.