InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 71
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2011

Re: colectinmrnj post# 37727

Thursday, 04/11/2013 9:35:42 AM

Thursday, April 11, 2013 9:35:42 AM

Post# of 85097
I believe that "driving the price down" is the goal of several posters here.

For a pinkie stock, MRNJ (and the APP industry) is one of the few where revenues can (and are) be verified by a third (neutral) party daily. I understand that some investors feel "wronged" by, in their opinion, dilution to profit the management. I see it as the company investing to make the company stronger in the long term. I think there is evidence to support either argument. I like seeing the growing revenues, and, with the potential release of more mega apps, believe that the revenue growth trend can continue for some time.

I do agree with Cheche, that an increase in a/s would be toxic to future investors. I also agree with Compro that a R/S would also be toxic to investors. I, however, disagree with the contacting of content providers to show displeasure with MRNJ. This could be seen as tampering, and does have the outside potential of legal action. I don't think I personally would risk this.

C . Neil Milton

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MRNJ News