InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 100
Posts 7904
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/04/2012

Re: mrjic post# 8137

Wednesday, 04/10/2013 11:42:27 AM

Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:42:27 AM

Post# of 46480
I have only seen those people present logical and fact-based information for the most part. They, like myself, are just tired of baseless pumping, as it tends to do harm and exaggerate inevitable negative news associated with patent litigation stocks and ultimately exasperates the subsequent sell off by John Q public. The same way that you may feel attacked and frustrated by their posts and respective tones, is the same way they and I feel about comments that may do harm to the investment in question. You are obviously entitled to an opinion of someone, or anything for that matter, but I will say this about that... Just as you should never get emotionally involved in a stock, I also recommend taking the tone of a post in response to yours with a grain of salt. Don't let feelings creep into a response, but rather load it with facts or empirical numbers, as those tend to win more arguments in an investment community than anything else. Quite a few people rub me the wrong way, but I resist the urge to respond with a thunderous FU and start researching to see if I need to retract my statement or come back with facts to argue my point further. Cerebral personalities will always have an urge to argue their points, and often can't resist an opportunity to fire back at a subject they feel is inaccurate of factually false altogether. Such is life my friend.

As for Cooler, you don't have to like the guy, but you should definitely use him as a resource for anything factual in a given investment that he is active in. He truly is an obsessive and organized person who probably has a spread sheet he has created for any given topic at hand (which is a good thing in patent plays, given the number of motions, changes in facts and time line alterations that can and will occur). Good luck to you and all here.