InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/02/2011

Re: oren1 post# 2539

Tuesday, 04/02/2013 10:35:02 AM

Tuesday, April 02, 2013 10:35:02 AM

Post# of 20113
The Federal Appellate case was a split decision. The lower court had ruled completely in V/MC's favor. The appeal reversed part of that lower court decision. That decision, as I understand it, favored SMME regarding the activity of card users as they made the connection, when INSERTING the ATM/debit card, from the terminal being used to the account connected to the card. Thus saying: IF the Patent holds to be valid, this activity infringes upon it.
IF the patent is held NOT to cover this activity I would suggest to Chaya she ask for her money back which she spent on securing the patent.... :)

What went against SMME was the same activity but rather than inserting the card, the card is waved/passed over the terminal rather than being inserted.

My guess/confusion regarding this trial ahead is for the court to determine whether or not patent "464" is valid and covers the connection process between terminal and cardholder's account.

That's how I understand it. That's why I believe SMME will receive a summary judgement in its favor and the price will rise quickly with only a $ amount to be determined...which will be large. MY ADVICE: open a Roth IRA and buy SMME in it....all the profits will be TAX FREE when you reach age 59 1/2 and can take out the money without penalty!! :)

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SMME News