XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[tobinator00]

Alphi, I am posting revenues prior to the lawsuit being filed against Microsoft as no ruling on laches has been made relative to Microsoft. The presumption is that Judge Raymond Jackson was correct in ruling for Google that laches applied due to a blog post that Lycos was aware of how Adwords worked. How that blog post would apply to the Microsoft case, I do not see any connection. Also, many lawyers have commented that Judge Jackson was incorrect in many aspects of how he handled laches in the court and the ruling itself. He basically blindsided Vringo's counsel and did not allow them to present a defense prior to his ruling.

Perhaps you can tell us what evidence Microsoft has that will compel the Judge in the case to rule laches apply? My understanding is the burden of proof is on Microsoft to show laches apply. Thanks.