Well, if I should use the exclusion method, then I do not think that the delay is due to them (auditors) having problems with how many 0's there should be behind the 0 in the revenue column......
If I should give it a guess, then the issue/delay could be due to some accouting technical issues for when to book the revenue, e.g. if the NPU was paid upfront some time ago, but it was delivered in November, then when should it be added to the books? I know that a Danish company (VESTAS) has had some issues about when to book the revenues and what was the most correct procedure......I'm not saying that this is the case, but as mentioned, I'm rather sure that they are not discussing the 0 revenues, but rather when it should be booked and the conclusion ofcourse should be that they have revenues (IMO)!
On the boring side, they could ofcourse also be dicussing how to book the losses, write down the inventory and best turn off the company, but my positive mind cannot imagine that ;)
To the best of my guessing (and hoping), the delay is due to them going from being a company inventing new technology to being a company producing and selling the products - at least the clues I see around (from US, Asia and Africa, among others) is what is supporting this assumption, but you never know!
