"Low volume"? Elcheepo, do you realize that ever since the selloff, the average daily volume is greater than it was since before the selloff? And that further, before the selloff, you were long the stock and did not complain about the low volume as a reason for the stock price to "meander and slowly fall"? So do you see how some of us might consider your posts oddly negatively biased now given your prior positive bias?
I get it, I mean you sold, and so you want to feel right about your decision, so now things that you did not notice as negative before are cast in a negative light, for example the "low volume". And if this maybe goes fully to zero, you will get to feel that "whew, I made the right decision" feeling, but if they appeal please realize that wont happen for years. And an appeal is a distinct possibility otherwise the "low volume" would not have led to a 500% bounce from low to high so far.
If it were me who sold, I would personally realize this and instead try to wish everyone who had been my friends just days before THE BEST OF LUCK with their decisions, I would not come on and bash the stock incessantly acting AS THOUGH I was doing it FOR THEIR OWN GOOD. The biggest damage is done by the first big drop, you cant erase that by bashing now even if your motives were purely altruistic.
Anyway, that is just me, I suppose you will continue to post as you like as is your right, I just hope you would consider the feelings of the people here who you only weeks ago hoping to party with in Vegas, as well as examine the inconsistencies in your own logic about volume, etc.
AI
