InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252478
Next 10
Followers 73
Posts 3426
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/28/2004

Re: iandy post# 158934

Wednesday, 03/27/2013 5:52:21 PM

Wednesday, March 27, 2013 5:52:21 PM

Post# of 252478

For AF to allow the hedge fund guy to label Iclusig a "dirty drug" was irresponsible at best. If he as informed as he claims to be on the space he covers, he knows the data the FDA used included all the AE's and not just the ones attributed to the drug. Why allow some hedge fund guy with an obvious agenda to talk trash?




I think this becomes "irresponsible" if AF doesn't follow up once sales / EPIC results are known. I have no problem with AF giving voice to contrary opinions, but I think the intellectually honest thing requires that he follow up*.

But overall, who cares what one hedge fund guy says?? Shareholders are so sensitive, especially when 99% of the people deciding to prescribe the drug will never read that article.




* I place the onus for follow-up on AF because of the anonymity. If the HF guy attached his name to the opinions then I would be happy to follow up in the future.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.