InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 105
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2010

Re: Sam Dan post# 1297

Monday, 03/25/2013 4:59:15 PM

Monday, March 25, 2013 4:59:15 PM

Post# of 1761

Posted by me on another board: "The Idaho expansion must be great. To believe it is worth it to divert full attention from Don Roman, if only a little bit, to acquire and develop the opportunity in Idaho, must mean that expectations run high there. Of course diversifying from having all in Mexico is also great. The news release sounds like it could even beat Don Roman to production. We will have to stay tuned.”

But here I would also like to make an observation re the number of mineralized structures at Don Roman.

I noticed that there are two company presentations on the company website. One is dated October, 2012, and the other just one month later, November, 2012. The second is an expansion and upgrade visually.

But the big difference is the mention throughout of 70+ identified mineralized structures, up from 30+ in the October presentation. I do not think much has been said about that increase, either on this board, or by the company. It just changed. But that must be the work of Steve Eady and team. I am sure the number was increasing before October, but they just caught up with the new delineations of what is there in the November revision of the company presentation.

In any case, it would certainly seem to be a big deal that the number of identified mineralized zones more than doubled! There is plenty of reason to be excited to be a TARM shareholder, especially if one is buying at these prices.