Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[P53dragon]

My last post on Danman159: (Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!)

In essence, DocF's most recent post has a line that summarizes what Danman is about quite fittingly:

I don't see it that way at all. It wasn't the message, it was the method and style of delivery. It was also the refusal to acknowledge explanations and the constant spinning to be right.

Case in point, on toxicity: Dan wrote yesterday:

"now that they have gotten past the first cohort without significant toxicity"

Several days ago he said:

"This suggests that this growth suppressive, pro-apoptotic (cell death) pathway is activated in normal cells.To me, this would suggest significant toxicity, because it would inhibit the growth of the normal cells that are supposed to be growing, which is similar to what happens with normal chemotherapies."

So far he has refused to directly commented on this polar opposite change of stand.

Then, yesterday while talking with DocF, Danman brought up a nutlin study, to support his view on kevetrin. Although both agents are associated with P53, Danman knows full well they have vastly different MOA. Yet, he went on to argue that, despite his insistence that he does not know Kevetrin's MOA, that Kevetrin and nutlin are comparable. This is what DocF is talking about: spinning.

To me it is shocking and dispicable to see a student of science blatantly uses science for his personal gain.