I'm a long time bag holder on this (starting in 2005). I've become somewhat attentive to looking for alternate plays from initial stakeholders (questionable intentions) as many who follow this stock have. I usually see someone posting what I'm thinking. I have not seen this. I should also caviate that it is provided that there is no imediate movement from the Diac lawyers to contest the situation in federal court.
To maintain continuity, Diac had to recieve one tenth of one percent ownership. Now, if nothing moves to the federal courts, Calypso is "liquidated" by the reciever. With one tenth of one percent can Diac asume ownership of the patent and continue to pursue the case in federal court on his own? In other words, what we where trying to avoid all along - him runing off with the patent.
I know most of us have done the best we can to accept our fate, so I actually feel kind of bad stirring this up.