Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:09:35 PM
However I dont agree with your cocnclusions. This action was as I understand, part of the effort to convert to a Ch 11 reorg via an adversarial proceedure. That action was challenged when by the Court appointed trustee demanded pmt.
Once that occured the petitioner in the person of Howard Taylor withdrew his motion to convert the CH 11 petition.
In my opinion counsel for Brooklands was not being paid by Roth, Faber et al. and like the courted appointed Trustee opposed the Motion to convert to CH 11 for lack of payment, they withdrew they representation of Brooklands.
Where it stands now is that ASFX is in an involuntary CH 7 petition.
If you can provide a link I can review the file again and perhaps agree with some or all of your opinions or perhaps point out specific elements that support my theory.
Thanks for a civil and thoughtful response
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM