InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 122
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2012

Re: None

Friday, 03/08/2013 6:29:37 PM

Friday, March 08, 2013 6:29:37 PM

Post# of 16772
Texas Medical Press Release on NanoLogix's BNP Advantages

Read this lengthy press release from the Texas Medical Centers and then comment. This is not just a small company "tooting" it's own horn but a globally respected institution indicating that the NanoLogix technology is superior to the traditional testing methodology by almost an order of magnitude. Think about the potential numbers for sales and how this can be used in marketing the BNP and then the BNF in the US, Canada and Europe where Group B Strep tests are required as part of sound medical practices. The report even suggests that the BNF can be an incredible diagnostic advance. It is rare to see such an analytical and substantial PR from such an organization. It is not difficult to conclude that they are excited about the technology and the Center's central role in its testing, including the range of potential applications beyond even Strep. This is just the beginning of the NanoLogix movement. I hope certain interests are caught "short" on this and have to cover big time.

The link is:

http://www.uthouston.edu/media/story.htm?id=e3142cc6-bc5b-415d-8f17-8243da5eb58d


Search News Releases

Top Stories
Media Relations Team
News Archive
Featured Topics
UTHealth Expert List
For Journalists



Follow us on:

Facebook Twitter You Tube UTHealth Campus News Headlines
UTHealth researchers say more rapid test for Group B strep successful

More Sharing ServicesShare | Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on digg Share on email Share on print

Jonathan Faro, M.D.

HOUSTON – (March 8, 2013) – A more rapid laboratory test for pregnant women to detect potentially deadly Group B strep (GBS) has been successful at identifying GBS colonization in six and a half hours, according to the results of a study from The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth).

The more rapid test could be helpful for the 13 percent of patients who experience pre-term labor before they are screened for GBS, which usually occurs between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation. The current standard test takes 48 hours. Antibiotics can be administered at the time of delivery to kill the bacteria.

“This new test could change the management of patients who present to labor and delivery with threatened preterm labor and aren’t expected to deliver right away,” said Jonathan Faro, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences at The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, part of UTHealth. “It would likely gain use in this patient population, which is a small number, but still very significant clinically. We could target this population and this would help cut down on overuse of resources and minimize our contribution to the increased level of bacterial resistance.”

The new test, developed by NanoLogix, can also detect antibiotic sensitivities for women who are allergic to penicillin, saving the additional 48 hours the standard test for antibiotic sensitivity takes, Faro said.

GBS is the most common cause of sepsis (blood infection) and meningitis and a frequent cause of pneumonia in newborns, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC estimates the bacterium, which is passed from mother to child through the birth canal, is carried by 25 to 30 percent of women at any one time. Because GBS has few symptoms, many women do not know they are carriers. In 2001, 1,700 babies less than 1 week old contracted GBS, which can lead to disability and death.

In the study, 356 patients at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation at UT Physicians clinics were tested for GBS using two standard tests and the new test, which provided a high level of validity according to the study results.

Faro is studying an even faster version of the test with the hope it could detect GBS in as little as 30 minutes. That could make a difference for the up to 15 percent of pregnant women who arrive for full-term delivery and have not been screened. Right now, obstetricians must determine whether to give these women intravenous antibiotics automatically or use risk factors, which have been shown to be only half as effective as laboratory tests, to assess whether the patient has the bacteria.

“Typically, if a patient comes into the emergency room in labor and you don’t know if she carries GBS, you have to treat her with antibiotics,” Faro said. “Everyone is concerned that the overuse of antibiotics is leading to greater resistance to them. Some have expressed concern that by giving penicillin to everyone, we are increasing the number of babies who are getting sick from E. coli sepsis.”

The study was published in a recent online edition of “Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology” and presented at the 33rd annual Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine meeting last month.

UTHealth co-authors include Sebastian Faro, M.D., the Dr. John T. Armstrong Professor in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Allan Katz, M.D., the Robert K. Creasy Professor in the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; Karen Bishop, clinical trial program manager; Gerald Riddle, research associate; and Mark Turrentine, research collaborator.