Thursday, March 07, 2013 1:03:59 PM
Like I said, it is important for one to do their own DD.
Guess Wallace is unfazed by the near certainty of his PUBLIC HUMILIATION and infuriating daddy...
BTW, just because a low level judge is ignorant, does not mean they are stupid, retarded, or in any way mentally or emotionally challenged. IMO, others may disagree...
So why was the SEC created if NOT to protect stockholders from ILLEGAL stock manipulation such as Wallace keeps bragging about?
Isn't that self defeating of Wallace, to brag about VIOLATING SEC regs?
Why would any sane person brag publicly about breaking any law, much less Federal?
Is that why the FBI is now assembling a file on Wallace et al?
This ILLEGAL manipulation he keeps bragging about?
NONE of Spencer's stock will be sold...
...by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
The IRREFUTABLE reasons why it CANNOT happen are:
1. The proposed sale VIOLATES Federal securities laws, specifically Rule 144 which governs the sale of all restricted stock, REGARDLESS of WHO is doing the selling or the circumstances.
Rule 144 REQUIRES that ONLY FINRA/SEC brokers execute ANY and ALL sales.
Further, Rule 144 does NOT allow Beneficial Owners (those that hold more than 5% of the issued and outstanding) to sell more than 1% of the issued and outstanding per 90 day period. The SEC has this long standing reg in place to protect stockholders from the type of illegal shenanigans that Wallace et al are attempting to pull off. That is only 5M or so shares PER 90 days!
http://geckosystems.com/W_W_W/Appelants_Reply_Brief.pdf
So the sheriff does not have to comply with ALL of Rule 144's regs?
SURE, they do!
BECAUSE:
2. Federal law ALWAYS trumps state law.
Whenever state law conflicts with Federal law, FEDERAL ALWAYS prevails and precludes enforcement of any and all state laws that conflict with Federal laws.
3. GOSY's DE attorney has demonstrated competence MANY times.
Wallace has NEVER collected ANYTHING in the 5 years of his FAILED attempts to collect monies from GOSY and/or the Spencers NOT legitimately earned by him or allegedly due his parents.
Therefore, NONE of Spencer's stock CAN be sold by Neil Wallace, his parents, the "sheriff," or anyone else.
In conclusion, the Spencers will NOT be losing majority control of GOSY since their 51% ownership is in preferred GOSY shares is NOT at risk in ANY manner, or have ANY of their common stock holdings sold, either.
Wallace has chosen to not make public the so called opinion letter he hee haws about being the "end all" solution supporting his position. Of course he won't since his position is INDEFENSIBLE.
facts remain facts-
Mech
HealthLynked Corp. Announces Third Quarter and Year-to-Date 2024 Results with Strategic Restructuring, Third-Party Debt Repayment, and Core Technology Focus • HLYK • Nov 15, 2024 8:00 AM
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Unitronix Corp. Publishes Its Cryptocurrency Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Nov 14, 2024 8:05 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM