InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 441
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/26/2001

Re: DABOSS post# 33278

Wednesday, 03/19/2003 12:33:02 PM

Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:33:02 PM

Post# of 93826
DABOSS. If ANYONE on this board would know whether or not it is true that(RP=WN's son in law)+(FF=Son of WN's Investor),it would be YOU.

If YOU say that you KNOW neither of these 2 relationships are true, then I (for one) believe you.

On the other hand,if YOU say that you DON'T KNOW either of these 2 relationships are true, and someone later proves either one of them IS true, then it's safe to say that you DID in fact know all along.

ANYONE who spends as much time as YOU publicly defending and/or ignoring the competency of the FF/RP management team, would certainly HAVE TO KNOW whether or not the relationships are indeed true or false.

I (for one) can't think of any other reason why these 2 guys would still be around unless it was in fact due to these relationships.....and wouldn't it need to be disclosed that RP is in fact related to WN?

You may not care, but if you say it ain't so, then I believe you. If you keep dancin' around the question, then it's safe to say that your selective memory condition may be popping up again.

DABOSS.....Please, say it ain't so.....Put this rumor to a stop.





Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.