InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 475
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/22/2013

Re: Krazy K post# 217099

Tuesday, 03/05/2013 6:20:03 PM

Tuesday, March 05, 2013 6:20:03 PM

Post# of 312016

So what are your thoughts on the fuel agilyx is producing needing to be heated while transporting?



That is the same as #6 fuel which is called Bunker Fuel which I believe JBI has/is making as well. It has a waxlike property which has advantages is some cases. As for Agilyx's output, they seem to have a much more viable approach but yet they are continuing to be oppressed by 'the powers that be' that seem to keep the entire P2O possibility just out of reach to become commercially viable.

Just think, the government and the Chemistry Council commissioned studies on this and have still chosen to continue to subsidize recycling... Why? Just from a logical standpoint, if they diverted those subsidies to P2O it would take off and no doubt solve a long standing environmental waste issue... But yet they continue to help recycling which directly hurts P2O...

Now why would they continue to do this?
Unless there is a specific agenda to prevent it from becoming commercially viable.