InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 20258
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/08/2008

Re: 50 Bagger post# 204452

Tuesday, 03/05/2013 5:29:08 PM

Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:29:08 PM

Post# of 289427

Very hard to logically read his statement any other way. And he did not address the re-gagging of the TA.

What's a person to think?

I thought he should have addressed that, too, but I don't write or proof his communiques. It was a good opportunity missed.

In the absence of that which is not, that which is, is not.