If CLYW were legit, why after nearly two years since supposedly taking the industry by storm, are they not even mentioned in the following article? <A HREF="http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh09939_2005-11-17_09-08-01_sha202354_newsml" target="_blank">http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuoteCompanyNewsArticle.jhtml?duid=mtfh09939_2005-11-17_09-08-01_sha...</A> I don't get it either. There really must be no bite to their patent?