InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,431.60
(
-0.04%
)
US TECH 100
19,168.00
(
0.52%
)
Dow Jones
38,589.16
(
-0.15%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,615.00
(
0.64%
)
Post# of 92948
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

rocky301

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 110
Posts 6480
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2003

rocky301

Re: lasers post# 51221

Tuesday, 03/05/2013 1:21:57 PM

Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:21:57 PM

Post# of 92948
Just so everyone is aware, the fees asked for below that were denied is from PRIOR lawsuit A/G had against ACT that ran from Oct of 2007 thru March 18 of 2010. On a motion from A/G case was dismissed one day prior to jury trial. A/G then filed another lawsuit against ACT in August of 2011 that is still pending...

"Appellant thereafter filed a motion for attorney fees seeking $645,542.40. Appellant argued that it was the prevailing party under Massachusetts law,

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up