InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 131
Posts 4727
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2004

Re: Arthur Edward Whoof post# 216676

Friday, 03/01/2013 3:09:28 PM

Friday, March 01, 2013 3:09:28 PM

Post# of 312016
Not true! The REAL economics that are at work in regards to JBII are driven by the value of the technology to corporate interests whose cost equation is dictated by regulatory costs.

Massive, unending regulatory costs.

So, the very idea that the commodity price of the plastic is the driver of this matter is an approach that leads to invalid conclusions.

Rock Tenn proves this to everyone.

They have expensive regulatory requirements. They cut a deal with JBII to process everyday plastic coming out of their plants (that they would have to otherwise landfill) AND to dig up already landfilled plastic.

Anybody reading the contract knows that there is absolutely no relationship between commodity prices of plastic and Rock Tenn's decision to go forward.

The obvious concern of RKT is, was, and will continue to be plain to see: regulatory costs associated with disposal & landfill of plastics.

Simple as that.

The economics of this technology are no more related to a commodity cost for plastic than the moon is made of green cheese.

The technology will be a massive money maker because corporations, like RKT, can use it for a far tinier cost than they presently face due to regulations.

This clears the matter up, and. IMHO, its no longer necessary to bother people with the silly notion that JBII can not make money because of the commodity prices of plastic.

JBII can and will make LOTS on money because of the economics of the regulations that overburden corporations.

Period.

Imperial Whazoo

"Just my opinions, folks. Do your own due diligence & make your own decisions. DO NOT... I repeat... DO NOT make any investment decisions on my comments. They are my opinions. That's all they are... OPINIONS."