InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 2173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/23/2010

Re: big deal post# 59765

Monday, 02/25/2013 2:24:44 PM

Monday, February 25, 2013 2:24:44 PM

Post# of 60937
If TM succeeds in getting the courts to say, "The CLYW patent is junk," then it's worth nothing in this particular suit. But why did TM sign a non-infringement agreement with CLYW in the first place? If the courts toss our patent, it would suggest that any patent can be voided by an opponent with enough money and enough compliant judges. That would certainly make Daic look like a complete Bozo, wouldn't it?

As for the receiver's post-loss actions, he could still sell the patent to someone who wished to establishing a network using it. Can't estimate the efficacy of such a move.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.