InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 509
Posts 9867
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/28/2012

Re: lesl post# 1730

Saturday, 02/23/2013 3:45:40 PM

Saturday, February 23, 2013 3:45:40 PM

Post# of 57716
I agree contracts take time but there has been enough time. STWA is not just starting out. This China deal is already over a year old & STWA has been in talks with multiple companies around the globe for almost as long.

The AOT has been on a commercial pipeline in China since October 2012. That's 4-5 months, not 7 days, which should be more than sufficient, and guarantees at this point in the game are given as warranties, not promises. Hence the fact STWA just announced they are readied to ship product.

Please take time to think about what had to transpire to have a product this size readied to ship, then ask yourself if it makes sense they are they shipping this gigantic product to a company/s without firm contracts. I think not.

One of the reasons STWA chose China, and the contract is allegedly less lucrative, is or was, to break the ice. There is a lot more going on here than the public knows. STWA has shown us time & time again, they suck at investor relations but excel at getting the job done.

Go back through & read my intro, STWA has passed incredible milestones and the finish line is now within grasp. Either this is all one great big lie or it's the truth, and so far I have overwhelming evidence it's the truth and not one hint that there has ever been even a single instance of stretching the truth (Save Muller). This pressure cooker has been building steam & it's gonna blow all at once. Mark my post.smile
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News